Recent Changes · Search:

Dispense


Navigation Tips - Dritte


PmWiki

pmwiki.org

edit SideBar

Hpc /

K3-xFe5F15

DONE

Hyp: the site is always the center of a defective (no K) perovskite cube, the perovskite cube in K2Fe5F15. It is always present in all K3-xFe5F15, including K3-δFe5F15. Under the assumption of collinearity his allows to draw conclusions on the magnetic moment variation with x (around a defective site).

Check that the perovskite interstitial is compatible with dipolar fields for T<TN and FMuF for T>TN.

The FMuF fits below support this view:

Data sets with FMuF are in /home/roberto.derenzi/mulab/projects/Multiferroici/uSR_GPS_JulyDec2012/Kx/Data, logx in Kx/Log_RDR See Kx.readme for run logs and Kx-analisis.log for details Ordering temperatures in the figures

FMuF is the same in all (just a linear 1% reduction in d from x=0 to x=1)

Location of data sets:


K2 jul

K25 jul e dec

K275 dec

K285 jul

K2965 dec

K3 jul

2295

(160K)

2318, 2327, 2328, 2330

(250, 135, 140, 150K)

7130-1 7134-6

(130-155 K)

2342 2351

(200, 123 K)

7116

(125 K)

2299, 2311

(300, 125 K)

Checked against sites where the dipolar field for {$m_\taxt{Fe} = 4.75 \mu_B$} is within {0.5 \le B_d\le 1$ T at all symmetry replicas. None is close to midways between two F ions within 2.8 A. Actually the fit dictates that the muon must be midway between two F ions 2.42 A away, but even if we allow for some relaxation, there is none so near.

There are instead many sites at any chosen distance from just one F ion. However the hm fit (single nucleus) is far from acceptable (best {$\chi_r^2=1.2$} on K2 at 160K, where it should be {$0.97\le \chi_r^2\le 1.03$} on that dataset).

It is probably necessary to see if the structure relaxes to a muon site with two much closer F than in the regular lattice.


In this process developed a mulab fit FMuF with an angle by

  • checking wd in fmuf calc, ok
  • fit coefficients from fmuf numerical calculation, see FMuF_theta_scan_calc_full.ipynb
  • build powders fitting function of parameters, done mufmufangle.m (modified also mu_initialize_models)
    • A = amplitude
    • d = FMu distance
    • theta
    • usual DeGa and DeLo convolutions

pretty useless, for now, the straight fmuf plus a longitudinal decay function fits ok. Looks as if there are two sites, an FMuF and a site far from Fluorines. Look back at dipolar fields.

Edit - History - Print - PDF - Recent Changes - Search
Page last modified on April 12, 2017, at 05:00 PM