• View
• Edit
• History
• Print

MuonDiamagnetiShift

< From muon rates to London penetration | Index | Fitting Flux Lattices with a single Gaussian? >

Let us consider a muon superconducting sample in the shape of a slab. In an infinite slab the external induction {$B_0=\mu_0 H$} must coincide with the average induction inside the slab.

Consider the simplified sketch on the right, showing the slab S (solid line), a red Gaussian surface P and the induction field lines. We neglect transverse field components, i.e we go far enough from the slab surface. Outside the induction is uniform. Inside there is a flux lattice, shown as dense and rarefied field line regions.The flux through the two large faces of P must be equal. The one outside, {$P_{out}$} experiences a uniform field and {$$ \int_{P_{out}} \mathbf B \cdot d \mathbf a =AB_0$$}

The one well inside the slab, {$P_{in}$}, experiences a non uniform field, distributed along {$\hat z$} according to {$p(B_z)$}, and

{$$ \int_{P_{in}} \mathbf B \cdot d \mathbf a = A\overline{B} = A \int dB_z p(B_z) $$}

therefore it must be {$B_0=\overline{B}$}. However experimentally it is not: the broadened precession line from muons implanted in the superconductor bulk is shifted diamagnetically, well beyond experimental error, to and average {$B_d\ll B_0$}.

The shift is due either from shape significant deviations from the infinite slab geometry or by the loss of the high field tail of the distribution, easily below noise level. A simple example of the first case is illustrated in the very qualitative sketch on the right. Since the demagnetization factor of the sphere is {$N={1 \over 3}$} a corresponding fraction of flux is expelled from the sample. {$$\int dB_z p(B_z)=A(1-N\chi)B_0,$$}

Of course magnetic Gauss law is still valid (easy to see on Gaussian surface P), but one cannot neglect the transverse components of the induction and the measured {$B_d$} is related, but not equal to the average {$B_z$} value. A slightly more complex case arises for powders where the average {$N$} over the grain shapes and orientations may need to be considered.

To estimate this effect, a typical TF experiment will observe a shift of order {$\mu_0 \chi N_\text{eff}H$}, proportional to the SQUID magnetization detected in the same magnetic field.

< From muon rates to London penetration | Index | Fitting Flux Lattices with a single Gaussian? >